Many U.S. defined benefit pension plans would state their ‘end game’ as being either one of hibernation – creating and maintaining a low-risk portfolio – or of termination – with the aim being to remove risk from the table as early as possible. But is it truly as clear cut as ‘hibernation versus termination,’ and do plans really need to make a choice to commit to one or the other?
Articles
Recent Articles
- Article: Pension Investing – A Brief History and Future Questions
- Article: The Case for a Low-Volatility Global Equity Allocation in Retirement Plans
- Article: Impact Of Ontario Election Examined
- Article: Portfolio Management – Why Correlation Matters
- Article: How Canada’s Hedge Fund Sector Continues to Evolve
Professional Directories
Research
Lessons from across the pond DC plans in the US and the UK
Published By: Eversheds Sutherland | 12/02/2018
As in many areas, when it comes to saving for retirement the US and UK share a number of things in common. Although both countries have a history of DB plans, these are now predominantly legacy arrangements with most closed to new participants and, in many cases, future accrual also. Read More
Recent Research Papers
- The stress factor and its impact on employees’ mental and physical health
Morneau Shepell - Investment Outlook. Year-end review and 2018 outlook
HSBC Global Asset Management - DB SOLUTIONS InSights
Sun Life Financial - Shifting Global Trade Patterns Bring New Opportunities
Capital Group - Selecting a factor strategy
HSBC Global Asset Management
